Which standard is based on the admissibility of scientific examinations in legal cases?

The correct answer is the Frye Standard, which is significant in legal contexts as it pertains to the admissibility of scientific evidence in court proceedings. Established in the 1923 case Frye v. United States, the Frye Standard stipulates that scientific evidence is admissible only when the methodology or technology used is generally accepted by experts in the relevant scientific field. This means that if a certain scientific technique is not widely accepted, the evidence derived from it may not be allowed in court.

In contrast, while the Daubert Standard, introduced later, also addresses the admissibility of expert testimony, it emphasizes the reliability and relevance of the evidence over general acceptance in the scientific community. The Schneiderman Standard does not specifically relate to scientific examinations, nor does FERPA, which primarily protects the privacy of student education records. Thus, the Frye Standard remains a crucial benchmark for evaluating scientific and forensic methods in legal scenarios.